Molecular Characterization and Antibiogram of Salmonella Enterica and Its Non-Typhoidal Serotypes in Poultry Feed with Seasonal Effects in Karachi, Pakistan.

Authors

  • Shajeela Iram Department of Pathology, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, 75340, Pakistan.
  • Rafiq Khanani Department of Pathology, Baqai Medical University, Karachi, 75340, Pakistan.
  • Gulbeena Saleem Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore.
  • Syed Khurram Fareed Dow Institute for Advanced Biological & Animal Research, Dow University of Health Sciences. Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Tanzeela Farooq Department of live stock and fisheries Animal husbandry wing, Govt of Sindh, 7100, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67773/bios.v7i2.262

Keywords:

Total viable count,, Antimicrobial susceptibility test, Polymerase chain reaction, Foodborn pathogens, Seasonal effects.

Abstract

Salmonella enterica and its non-typhoidal serotypes are major foodborne zoonotic pathogens responsible for salmonellosis, one of the most common gastrointestinal diseases worldwide. This study aimed to molecularly identify S. enterica and its non-typhoidal serotypes (S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium), evaluate the seasonal influence on bacterial growth, and determine their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. A total of 204 poultry feed samples were analyzed using cultural and biochemical methods, followed by confirmation with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Bacterial load was determined by total viable count (TVC), while antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using the disk diffusion method and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Of the 204 samples, 66 (32.3%) were confirmed as S. enterica. Among these, 31 (46.9%) were identified as S. Typhimurium and 21 (31.8%) as S. Enteritidis. The highest mean bacterial load (7.026 × 10⁸ CFU/g) was recorded during June–August, while the lowest (2.395 × 10⁸ CFU/g) occurred during December–February, with a significant seasonal difference (p < 0.01). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that all non-typhoidal S. enterica serotypes were highly resistant to penicillin and its derivatives but remained largely susceptible to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. The high prevalence of Salmonella in poultry feed during hot and humid months highlights an increased risk of foodborne transmission. These findings emphasize the need for improved storage practices, enhanced pre-harvest control measures, and continuous surveillance of microbial contamination and antimicrobial resistance to safeguard public health.

References

1. He Y, Wang J, Zhang R, Chen L, Zhang H, Qi X et al. Epidemiology of foodborne diseases caused by Salmonella in Zhejiang Province, China, between 2010 and 2021. Front Public Health. 2023;11.

2. Igbinosa IH, Amolo CN, Beshiru A, Akinnibosun O, Ogofure AG, Akinnibosun F. Identification and characterization of MDR virulent Salmonella spp isolated from smallholder poultry production environment in Edo and Delta States, Nigeria. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0281329.

3. Fung F, Wang HS, Menon S. Food safety in the 21st century. Biomed J. 2018;41(2):88-95.

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Salmonella homepage [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2019 [cited 2026 Jun 29]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/salmonella/general/index.html

5. Irfan S, Rabbani M, Sheikh AA, Firyala S, Shaheen AY. Microbial quality, biochemical identification and molecular detection of Salmonella targeting His-J gene in poultry meat and feed in Lahore. Pak J Zool. 2023;55(4):1545-1551.

6. Siala M, Barbana A, Smaoui S, Hachicha S, Marouane C, Kammoun S et al. Screening and detecting Salmonella in different food matrices in southern Tunisia using a combined enrichment/real-time PCR method: correlation with conventional culture method. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2416.

7. Ashrafudoulla M, Na KW, Byun KH, Kim DH, Yoon JW, Mizan MFR et al.Isolation and characterization of Salmonella spp. from food and food contact surfaces in a chicken processing factory. Poult Sci. 2021;100(8):101234.

8. Samper-Cativiela C, Prieto ME, Collado S, De Frutos C, Branscum AJ, Saez JL et al. Risk factors for Salmonella detection in commercial layer flocks in Spain. Animals (Basel). 2023;13(20):3181.

9. Gole VC, Woodhouse R, Caraguel C, Moyle T, Rault JL, Sexton M et al. Dynamics of Salmonella shedding and welfare of hens in free-range egg production systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(10):e03313-16.

10. Pławińska-Czarnak J, Wódz K, Kizerwetter-Świda M, Bogdan J, Kwieciński P, Nowak T et al. Multi-drug resistance to Salmonella spp. when isolated from raw meat products. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(7):876.

11. Chah JM, Nwankwo SC, Uddin IO, Chah KF. Knowledge and practices regarding antibiotic use among small-scale poultry farmers in Enugu State, Nigeria. Heliyon. 2022;8(4):e09342.

12. Monte DF, Lincopan N, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Landgraf M. Current insights on high priority antibiotic-resistant Salmonella enterica in food and foodstuffs: a review. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2019;26:35-46.

13. International Organization for Standardization. Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the detection of Salmonella spp. ISO 6579:2002. Geneva: ISO; 2002.

14. Cheesbrough M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. Part 2. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

15. Garcia LS. Clinical microbiology procedures handbook. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. Washington (DC): ASM Press; 2010.

16. International Organization for Standardization. Recommendation of meeting of the subcommittee, International Organization for Standardization on meat and meat products. ISO/TC 36 Section 6:10-18. The Netherlands: ISO; 1995.

17. Alvarez J, Sota M, Vivanco AB, Perales I, Cisterna R, Rementeria A et al. Development of a multiplex PCR technique for detection and epidemiological typing of Salmonella in human clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(4):1734-1738.

18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard. CLSI document M02-A11. 7th ed. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2012.

19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved standard. CLSI document M07-A9. 9th ed. Wayne (PA): CLSI; 2012.

20. Jaffee S, Henson S, Unnevehr L, Grace D, Cassou E. The safe food imperative: accelerating progress in low- and middle-income countries. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2019.

21. Tegegne FM. Epidemiology of Salmonella and its serotypes in human, food animals, foods of animal origin, animal feed and environment. J Food Nutr Health. 2019;2(1):7-14.

22. Shahbazi G, Shayegh J, Ghazaei C, Ghazani MHM, Hanifian S. Molecular detection, typing, and virulence potential of Salmonella serotypes isolated from poultry feeds. Pol J Vet Sci. 2023;26(2):239-247. doi:10.24425/pjvs.2023.145028.

23. Resendiz-Nava C, Esquivel-Hernandez Y, Alcaraz-Gonzalez A, Castaneda-Serrano P, Nava GM. PCR assay based on invA gene amplification are not reliable for Salmonella detection. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2019;12(2):e68764.

24. Ashraf M, Ahmed A, Shimamoto T. Isolation and molecular characterization of Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Shigella spp. from meat and dairy products in Egypt. Int J Food Microbiol. 2014;168-169:57-62.

25. Powell MR, Crim SM, Hoekstra RM, Williams MS, Gu W. Temporal patterns in principal Salmonella serotypes in the USA, 1996-2014. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146(4):437-441.

26. Toro M, Weller D, Ramos R, Diaz L, Alvarez FP, Reyes-Jara A et al. Environmental and anthropogenic factors associated with the likelihood of detecting Salmonella in agricultural watersheds. Environ Pollut. 2022;306:119298.

27. Bilal M, Azeem S, Aslam A, Abbas S, Riaz MI, Shahzad F, et al. Evidence of Salmonella enterica in Pakistani backyard poultry breeds: isolation, molecular characterization, and pathology. Vet Ital. 2023;59(4). doi:10.12834/VetIt.2870.19149.3.

28. Ehuwa O, Jaiswal AK, Jaiswal S. Salmonella, food safety and food handling practices. Foods. 2021;10(5):907.

29. Machado Junior PC, Chung C, Hagerman A. Modeling Salmonella spread in broiler production: identifying determinants and control strategies. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:564.

30. Bamidele O, Amole TA, Oyewale OA, Bamidele OO, Yakubu A, Ogundu UE et al. Antimicrobial usage in smallholder poultry production in Nigeria. Vet Med Int. 2022;2022:7746144. doi:10.1155/2022/7746144.

31. Fatima A, Saleem M, Nawaz S, Khalid L, Riaz S, Sajid I, et al. Prevalence and antibiotics resistance status of Salmonella in raw meat consumed in various areas of Lahore, Pakistan. Sci Rep. 2023;13:22205. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49487-2.

32. Ammari, S, Laglaoui A, En-nanei L, Bertrand S, Wildemauwe C, Barrijal S, Abid M. Characterization of Salmonella Enteritidis isolated from foods and patients in northern Morocco. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2009;3(9):695-703.

33. Divek VTN, Kumar V, Anup KJ. Antibiotic-resistant Salmonella in the food supply and the potential role of antibiotic alternatives for control. Foods. 2018;7(10):16

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Iram, S., Khanani, R., Saleem, G., Syed Khurram Fareed, & Tanzeela Farooq. (2026). Molecular Characterization and Antibiogram of Salmonella Enterica and Its Non-Typhoidal Serotypes in Poultry Feed with Seasonal Effects in Karachi, Pakistan. BioSight, 7(2), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.67773/bios.v7i2.262

Issue

Section

Original Article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.